Running is easy yes? Put one foot in front of the other. Running up and down hills is good yes? Helps with strength, balance, power and speed. But when it comes to the fine detail, there are many opinions.
Everyone has opinions. To help clarify what some of mine are I shall analyse other people's. Remember, what they say and what I think are still just opinions.
I'm not sure there's a "proper form"; we are all different.
Maybe, but posture is more than head and chest. It is also a good pelvic tilt which switches on the hip flexors and brings the knees up. And it's more than that too.
Yeah, and sleekly trip over a rock.
Not sure about that, All drive starts in the arms, the legs follow. Some active tension would seem necessary in the hands and wrists as the arms drive forward and pull back.
I like that one!
I'd take it further; fly up the hill relaxed to start with, fly over the top, and fly down the other side, avoiding the temptation to recover by slowing down over the top. That's where I find I can break away from others in a race.
Yes, up, over, and beyond.
Up a hill it's not a bad idea. Lean slightly forward up hill and run tall. Lean slightly backward down hill and run tall.
Good except there must be some MOBILITY IN THE ELBOW JOINT. Does no-one understand this?
Yes that's what we try to do.
Especially when steep and rough I guess. I haven't checked this one out, I don't know where the feet "should" land.
My opinion is you should start out conservatively when you first train on hills, let the body adapt to the new kind of training, and learn what gets you up and over the hills faster. And I coach mature age runners, whose running form is often more suspect than the running form of kids. And I say, the key is, no two people are the same, and for each person, practice makes perfect.
Everyone has opinions. To help clarify what some of mine are I shall analyse other people's. Remember, what they say and what I think are still just opinions.
I'm not sure there's a "proper form"; we are all different.
Maybe, but posture is more than head and chest. It is also a good pelvic tilt which switches on the hip flexors and brings the knees up. And it's more than that too.
Yeah, and sleekly trip over a rock.
Not sure about that, All drive starts in the arms, the legs follow. Some active tension would seem necessary in the hands and wrists as the arms drive forward and pull back.
I like that one!
I'd take it further; fly up the hill relaxed to start with, fly over the top, and fly down the other side, avoiding the temptation to recover by slowing down over the top. That's where I find I can break away from others in a race.
Yes, up, over, and beyond.
Up a hill it's not a bad idea. Lean slightly forward up hill and run tall. Lean slightly backward down hill and run tall.
Good except there must be some MOBILITY IN THE ELBOW JOINT. Does no-one understand this?
Yes that's what we try to do.
Especially when steep and rough I guess. I haven't checked this one out, I don't know where the feet "should" land.
My opinion is you should start out conservatively when you first train on hills, let the body adapt to the new kind of training, and learn what gets you up and over the hills faster. And I coach mature age runners, whose running form is often more suspect than the running form of kids. And I say, the key is, no two people are the same, and for each person, practice makes perfect.