Sunday, 9 November 2008

Jackson Five

Posted by speedygeoff on Sunday, November 09, 2008 with


NO NO! this post is NOT about a suspect American pop group of yore.

Today my grandson Jackson Moore turns five !

The musical connection is correct, but the Jackson after whom he was named five years ago was Jackson Brown! Or so rumour has it. Jazz rules, OK?

MOORES


Jackson anticipating his birthday


Nathan with Jackson's brother Tyler


Jackson's and Tyler's brother Charlie


Jackson with his balloon Jenny and I sent him. We sent him other gifts as well. Any time we see Jackson though, balloons are MANDATORY!

Grandchildren are so COOL! they are so cute, in an ideal world their photos would sell like wild cakes!

Saturday, 8 November 2008

Keep training! But don't come running to me if you break your leg!

Posted by speedygeoff on Saturday, November 08, 2008 with
All the speedygeese track results from Thursday night.
1500m
M45 Rod Lynch 4:57.82 79.4%
M50 Gary Bowen 5:22.14 75.5
W40 Katie Forestier 5:35.68 74.8
M60 Kevin Chamberlain 5:38.54 78.8
M45 Roger Pilkington 5:54.28 67.4
M60 Geoff Sims 5:57.18 73.5
W45 Helen Larmour 6:12.26 73.4

3000m
M45 Rod Lynch 11:34.69 71.3%
M45 Roger Pilkington 12:27.03 66.8
M50 Gary Bowen 12:43.58 66.4
M60 Kevin Chamberlain 12:44.24 72.9
W40 Amanda Walker 12:49.07 68.2
W40 Katie Forestier 12:49.76 69.4
W45 Helen Larmour 12:55.39 74.9
W55 Miranda Rawlinson 14:44.16 71.0
W55 Ruth Baussmann 16:07.63 67.7

5000m
M60 Geoff Moore 19:54.96 78.8%
M45 Mick Horan 20:40.32 69.2

Spiral 6
6 Roger Pilkington M45 10:51
10 Miranda Rawlinson W55 12:12
13 Cathy Montalto W55 12:02
16 Rod Lynch M45 9:06
17 Margaret McSpadden W60 13:32
18 Ruth Baussmann W55 13:17
25 Gary Bowen M50 11:19
28 Kathy Sims W55 11:12
30 Jodie Sims W30 11:34
35 finishers

Not to look a gift horse in the eye, it was a perfect night for running, once the wind gusts had died down, and many speedygeese took advantage of the conditions to come out to ACTMA track. But speaking of horses, we do miss the Bilbys, their night at the track with us a couple of weeks ago was the most fun of alll.

And now for something completely different.



Third Place


Charlie and Maria at the Cotter holding the trophy they won for the Bulls Head Challenge. They tied for third place! Last and by all means least, that's Ken Eynon between them.

Friday, 7 November 2008

You have to shoot where the fish are barking

Posted by speedygeoff on Friday, November 07, 2008 with
The prize for the 50,000th visitor has gone to .... Sonia Veldhoven! Congratulations! The prize is in the mail. I won't reveal what the prize is, yet.

Track last night



Track results from last night will be out soon. I was pleased to get under 20 minutes for the 5k, a rarity for a normal Thursday night. It wasn't quite a walk in the cake, but much more improvement is possible. So I am still on track to run some decent times later in the season.


Amanda at the track last night.

Here's a feel-good story from the Pan Pacific Masters Games Athletics which has just concluded at the Gold Coast.
Blind 10,000m runner Labrador’s Damien Williams found himself in difficulty on the track when his guide fell sick. Andrew Clowes from Morningside in Brisbane, a competitor in the same race, decided to assist Williams for the remainder of the race even though it could have cost him his own chance of victory and meant he had to run an extra lap. It was Masters spirit at its best and will long be remembered by those who witnessed it. In the end Williams was guided to victory in his 35-39 age group in a time of 41 minutes 26.76 seconds, while Clowes was also victorious in the 45-49 category in 40:18.58. Clowes’ victory lap guided Williams to his gold medal.
(Written by Sophie Birse)

Who We Are?
I have just had a look at 'links'. Our world body is World Masters Athletics, our regional body Oceania Masters Athletics, our national body Australian Masters Athletics, our sister state bodies Masters Athletics WA, New South Wales Masters Athletics, Queensland Masters Athletics, South Australian Masters Athletics, Tasmanian Masters Athletics, Victorian Masters Athletics. And we are ACT Veterans Athletic Club. Never fear, there's a pot of gold at the end of the tunnel. From next May we will become ACT Masters Athletics. That's the plan. And it's the only sensible one we've got. I will be pushing for it with all the energy I can muster. You've gotta stick your neck out on a limb sometimes.

Athletics ACT has an 800m race on at 4:40pm tomorrow, and a 3000/5000 at 6pm. I might be able to make it for the latter.

Thursday, 6 November 2008

and the winner is....

Posted by speedygeoff on Thursday, November 06, 2008 with
....not yet known. This is a bit like a draw prize at the races where you have to be present to win. Either I must be able to identify you, or if I cannot you must claim! So first of all: #50,000 appears to have come from Victoria but may well have been Canberra because sitemeter doesn't always get it right, did open this blog at 10:41am today, and did come via domain bigpond.net.au. Claim now! If there are no legitimate claimants, I know who #49999 is, and not only that, #49999 is jumping up and down with hand in the air, tongue hanging out, very keen!

So #50000 you have until I write Friday's post to get back to me!

When my garmin is still hungry, it goes back four seconds.

Posted by speedygeoff on Thursday, November 06, 2008 with
Sometimes, with all this exercise, I'm so hungry I could beat a dead horse.



Curious that my Garmin played up on the Weston Park run. It measured the distance much shorter than it really was. It does that sometimes when there are trees overhead. It got the time right though. But does this mean I might be going further than I think I am on some of my runs? In a couple of half marathon races it has spat the dummy right towards the end too. Yes, I keep it charged up!

We Can Fix It



Yes We Can



And if you are close to or equal to number 50,000 on the sitemeter counter, let me know! The closest person I can identify will win a prize!

Wednesday, 5 November 2008

Running like a Duck on a Hot Tin Roof

Posted by speedygeoff on Wednesday, November 05, 2008 with


Spring Series #1- Weston Park 5k
Tuesday 4 November

22. Geoff Moore M60 20:33
35. Thea Zimpel 22:16
46. Roger Pilkington M45 23:37
51. David Baussmann M55 23:59
60. Caroline Campbell W65 25:34
65. Geoff Barker M60 26:15
77. Ruth Baussmann W55 27:35
84. Carolyne Kramar W40 28:46

102 finishers

A couple of speedygeese who were going to run, I thought, didn't turn up after all. They missed a cool evening and a very quiet park and cycle path. Very few Canberrans were out and about other than us runners. Perfect. I approached the run as an even-paced tempo run, a minute or two slower than "flat out". Surprisingly it was quite a good time but I felt comfortable, talking-pace-level all the way, and ran even splits, which leads me to believe the flatness I experienced last weekend was either (a) loss of heat adaptation, and/or (b) a virus which has now been fought off.

The course was possibly as short as 4.85k instead of the advertised 5k, but made up for it to some extent with its degree-of-difficulty. I expect the same effort on the track would have given me around 21 minutes or better for 5k.

And now, in breaking news, Annette and Dale are leaving Canberra for Brisbane very soon. As I don't think I can make their farewell this weekend, I will farewell them now. By-eee!


Annette running a good half.

The 50,000th hit on this blog will occur tomorrow, probably. There will be a prize for the 50,000th person if I can figure out who he or she is! Identification via sitemeter stats can be difficult and sometimes impossible. But it might be you! So read my blog again tomorrow.

Tuesday, 4 November 2008

Who needs rhetorical questions?

Posted by speedygeoff on Tuesday, November 04, 2008 with
song of the week: "Unwinding Cable Car" from Anberlin’s 2007 album, “Cities”. Although never making the charts here, this song is still getting regular airplay in Canberra. And is my favourite Anberlin song.

"What are your passions"?



"What will you be remembered for"?

Monday training. What happens when we extend our regular 25 minutes of hard training to 45 minutes for the first time? Answer - exhaustion! A good thing it was cooler than usual. On a circuit of just over 400m, we ran a 200m stretch as fast as possible, and jogged the rest, with our goal being (a) no stopping, (b) seeing how many circuits we could complete in 45 minutes. Despite the goal, stopping was allowed when needed for a rest, a stretch, or a drink. And if you were a 400m/800m specialist or just starting up again after injury, you were permitted to join in (with the fastest runners) every second circuit of theirs. Engaged in this challenging session were Alan, Amanda (19 laps), Bronwyn (19 laps), Cathy, Christopher, Gary (blisters got the better of him), me (17 laps), Jodie (15 laps), Joel (every second one, 9 laps), Katie (20 laps), Ken (20 laps), Mick C (16 laps), Miranda, Neil, Rachelle (every second one, 10 laps), Ruth (16 laps) and Yelena. We were fortunate that it was relatively mild, with a cool breeze.

We will be doing this session a few more times on Mondays. Or if conditions dictate, a modified version. A rolling stone kills no birds, so will you come on out and join us?!

This Thursday night's ACT Masters track program.
6.00pm spiral 6
6.30pm 1500m walk
6.45pm 60m
7.00pm 1500m
7.15pm 100m
7.30pm long hurdles
7.45pm 3000m/5000m

Today is a very special day. It is Joel & Yelena's second wedding anniversary! More photos can be found in Joel and Yelena's Facebook pages, where these came from.





Thea and Yelena



The Pearson clan

Monday, 3 November 2008

To Boldly Split Infinitives That No Man Has Split Before

Posted by speedygeoff on Monday, November 03, 2008 with
Why did the chicken cross the road?
It thought it was poultry in motion.

My training progress
last week’s target: 90k
achieved: 63k
year 2008 total to date: 3383k in 44 weeks
this week's target: 90k
weight: 65kg ►◄

Splitting the Infinitive
Grammatical pedantry insists that, when writing and speaking, one should universally avoid splitting the infinitive. I might launch a counter-proposal: to always insist on avoiding the split infinitive is ludicrous and often compromises meaning.

For example, the word "gradually" has different shades of meaning depending on where it appears in the following sentence:
I managed to just run 63k last week, but at least it was 50% further than the previous one. Repeating that this week will bring me up to my target distance, after which I want to gradually increase my total distance, weather and luck with injury permitting.

Another example, a good case for using the split infinitive is in an exchange, where there is an echo of a previous statement made by oneself or by another:
I meant to publish a link to an article entitled "Don’t forget to regularly exercise to improve memory" when it first came out, but I accidentally forgot. In future I will try harder not to "accidentally forget".

Or the use of an emphatic adverb such as "really":
I need you all to really get stuck into training and come out today as we start a new phase of speed endurance.

As a wannabe writer, I wonder should writers learn to not split infinitives? I think not. Rules of grammar can be too tight.

Origin of the prohibition of split infinitives
The rules only emerged in the nineteenth century. But they may be based on a mistaken belief that Latin, where infinitives are only one word, should be the benchmark. One could also argue that the move was anti-France, as the French language makes split infinitives mandatory. Given the English attitude towards the French, such a hypothesis seems very likely.

English is not Latin, however.

A new start


The start of Bulls Head; after ten months of unprecedented consistency, the resumption of a new period of inconsistency?

Neil takes off at O'Connor Ridge


Are speedygeese also "poultry in motion"? I'd say so.

Sunday, 2 November 2008

Faster! Faster!

Posted by speedygeoff on Sunday, November 02, 2008 with
They were running hand in hand, and the Queen went so fast that it was all she could do to keep up with her: and still the Queen kept crying ‘Faster! Faster!’ but Alice felt she could not go faster, though she had not breath left to say so. The most curious part of the thing was, that the trees and the other things round them never changed their places at all: however fast they went, they never seemed to pass anything…

‘In our country,’ said Alice, still panting a little, ‘you’d generally get to somewhere else – if you ran very fast for a long time, as we’ve been doing.’ ‘A slow sort of country!’ said the Queen. ‘Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place. If you want to get somewhere else, you must run at least twice as fast as that!’


-Lewis Carroll, "Through the Looking Glass"



Thursday night results
400m
M55 Ken White 65.09 78.7%

4x800m relay
1. M50 Phil White, Michael Leahey, Ken White, Michael Clancy 9:39.77

2. M60 Geoff Moore, Geoff Sims, Garry Maher, Kevin Chamberlain 10:29.19 Australian record by 19.2 seconds

3. M45 Bruce Graham, Roger Pilkington, Nigel Coldrick, Bryce Anderson 10:50.55

4. mixed Steve Johnstone, Jim White, Rod Lynch, Ken Eynon 11:10.74

5. mixed Bronwyn Calver, Nadine Thomlinson, Jill Pearson, Alexandra Simpson 12:08.68

6. W55 Cathy Montalto, Maureen Rossiter, Ruth Baussmann, Kathy Sims 12:30.07

7. M70 Roger Abbott, John MacLeod, Peter Trotter, Ray Bramwell 13:44.46

3000m
M45 Rod Lynch 10:53.03 75.8 %
W40 Katie Forestier 11:41.10 76.2 pb
M45 Roger Pilkington 12:14.90 67.9
M60 Geoff Moore 12:21.40 73.8
W45 Helen Larmour 12:42.86 76.1
W40 Amanda Walker 12:52.64 67.9
W35 Bronwyn Calver 13:21.28 65.0
W55 Cathy Montalto 14:32.98 72.9
W55 Ruth Baussmann 16:05.43 67.8

5km
M50 Ewen Thompson 21:53.35 66.4%

Saturday afternoon results
400m
Joel 57.15

1500m
me 5:56.68
Ewen 6:02.67

3000m
Yelena 15:05 pb

Sometime between Thursday night and Saturday afternoon I stepped through the looking glass into Opposite World. I felt like a goose out of water in the 1500m. No life, no energy. I was slower than superflake! But at least it wasn't my PW. (Punched Wherever).



For today's run I turned up at the Masters 9am pack run at Stromlo, only to discover the time had been changed to 8am. So because of November changes, or possibly because we are in a looking glass alternate reality, here are my plans this week.

Monday 3rd
9:20am normal gym class
4:30pm Parliament House preliminary jog (Strewth needs to attend this one if she is going to regain her lead over Yelena)
5:30pm Main Parliament House meeting time; a shorter warmup than usual so we can fit more serious running in, from the Rose Garden by 5:50pm.

Tuesday 4th
6:15pm (note new starting time) Spring Series #1, Weston Park (note venue). Various other sources, and I now note that the Canberra Times is yet another, have the venue wrong. This is a 5k race which I will use as a tempo run. Should be fun; there will be people everywhere at Weston Park because workers (not me!) have some sort of holiday that day.

Wednesday 5th
9:10am gym class - new time, new day, because my 9:20 Friday one is cancelled due to a launch of "Heart Moves" at the gym
10:30am 14k run

Thursday 6th
ACT Masters Track.
6:00pm spiral 6
7:00pm 1500m
7:45pm 3000m/5000m
I may run all three, for training purposes!
A chance to shave some time off the 5000m, Ewen!

Friday 7th
The easy run I usually do on Wednesdays

Saturday 8th
Athletics ACT track.
4:40pm
800m
6:00pm 3000m/5000m
I am busy from 2:00 to 4:00 so my plan is to arrive late and run the 5000m and shave even more time. Or if I cannot find my legs, 3000m will do.

Sunday 9th
8:00am Stromlo long run
I will probably run easy for an hour, then meet any 9:00am starters Ewen, and run easy for another hour.

Another change of times, down the track, this month being November, the handicap run on Sunday 30th at Inaabanya starts at 8:30am, not 9:00am.

Raring to go.


Ewen and Strewth lining up at O'Connor Ridge. Ewen is taller than I thought!

Saturday, 1 November 2008

Still sailing through life on a bed of roses

Posted by speedygeoff on Saturday, November 01, 2008 with
Today at the track, Athletics ACT has its "number two" program, which includes
3.45pm 3000m
4.10pm 1500m

There are also steeplechase races after 6pm. It is a much cooler day today than it was yesterday, and I am looking forward to running a 1500m.

This coming Monday at Parliament House, a friend of mine I used to work with called Ann plans to wave a Hawaiian shirt out the window of her car on Monday when she drives past us at Parliament House Training. When she does, everyone must honk like a goose! "Friends I used to work with" are a very rare species indeed. Unlike with most of my workmates, Ann and I used to get on like a horse on fire.

Track results: Most of the T&F results from Thursday are still not available. Check again tomorrow.

I was impressed with Cathy Montalto who came out on Thursday for a rare run on the track. She was there to run in the W55 4 x 800m relay, but she had a bit of time up her sleeve so ran the 100m first. That's very brave for a long distance runner! Not only that, the 100m was the Daniels handicap, and she was off 24 metres, which means her actual racing distance was only 76 metres. Afterwards Cathy told me she must run more of them, they are over so quickly!

Always a smile


Cathy Montalto running at the October handicap

Friday, 31 October 2008

How we set a new Australian record last night.

Posted by speedygeoff on Friday, October 31, 2008 with
Last night there were four of us in the M60 age group who set out to break the ACT record for 4x800m.

The ACT M60 record was 11:26.1. And I also thought we had a chance of breaking the Australian M60 record of 10:48.6, held by Victoria.

Right from the outset the monkey was in my court; I led off and it was up to me not to spoil the party by breaking down! My very few attempts at 8oom in the last 15 years had generally resulted in injury, as often as not in the course of the race. But I figured a 1500m pace 2:50 would still be good enough for the team to have a chance to get the Australian record. But as well as never having trained for the 800m in recent decades, I had hardly trained at all in the previous ten days owing to the 27.2k Bulls Head run destroying my quads more than I initially thought it had. And I had a cold, which I don't treat when I have to run, because I don't want health problems which might arise as a result of disguising any health issues.

So I ran "conservatively". But somehow managed about 80 seconds for each lap. Way faster than any training sessions. And for the first time I can remember in the hundreds of 800m races I have run in the last 47 years, there was no lactate in the legs down the finishing straight.

Geoff Sims ran second; he did brilliantly considering he too was badly affected by the flu; I think he ran about 2:34. Geoff is the ACT's M60 400m record holder and is tending to specialise these days in 200, 400 and 800.

Garry Maher ran third; he looked great and kicked around the two laps at a fast tempo, maintaining the pace very well for a sprinter. Actually Garry specialises in the 100m and 200m but often competes in the 400m, 300m hurdles, and 800m, and even the occasional 1500m. He ended up with a time of about 2:40.

Kevin Chamberlain ran the last leg; he specialises in 800m and 1500m and is finding some very good form this season after having a couple of easier seasons. Kevin set some amazing ACT records in the years he turned 50 and 55 and seems to have regained his youthful motivation this year. He looked so smooth running in the relay, and finished fast. I imagine he ran about 2:34. Given the breeze, the warmth, and the difficulty runners 2, 3 and 4 have in judging pace in a relay, that was an outstanding run. Kevin ran 2:30 in a scratch race a week ago and was delighted with that time then.

So we ran 10:29.19: A whole 57 seconds faster than the old ACT record, and 19.2 seconds faster than the Australian record. And the good thing is, if we all have very good days next time, I think we can go 20 or 25 seconds faster.

As for me, it's the breakthrough I was waiting for: a respectable time for an 800m, with no pain. Now I have the confidence to train for the 800m like the old days, and to run a few more of them. It also means that next year at Geelong in February and at Adelaide in April, I will have the confidence to race the 1500m at the national level, as well as the 5000m which is still my main race. For now.

There's no doubt about it: the best 60 year old middle distance runners in Australia live in Canberra!

Obviously I am excited by the relay, but wait there's more. Before I close off, there were other great runs on the track last night, and I will publish the times for them when they appear on the ACT Masters website. But I wanted to highlight the fantastic 3000m run by our Katie. It was her day for a big breakthrough: a pb of 11:40. The 3000m had the biggest field we have had for years; and it was of high quality too. The winner Scott McTaggart broke the ACT M30 record; and the Katie says she benefited by chasing some of the good runners in the field.

Katie


Katie Forestier looking fit and well at October's ACT Masters Monthly handicap. Photo also starring Roger Pilkington and Gary Bowen.

Thursday, 30 October 2008

The Big Issue

Posted by speedygeoff on Thursday, October 30, 2008 with
The ACT election results have just been finalised. A summary for non-ACT readers: the first mob campaigned on how bad the second mob were. The second mob campaigned on how bad the first mob were. The third mob were a group of hippies who relied on voters being stoned to get any votes. There is no fourth mob. Yet to be determined is which two mobs are going to get together to form government, or whether they will give up trying and instead gather in three corners of the room shouting at each other.

The elector knew what the big issue was.



Spoilers Ahead
I hate having to explain a joke. Usually it spoils the joke. So before you read the "spoilers" ahead, have another look at the cartoon above, enlarge it, see if you get the joke. I should explain that non-ACT readers will not get it in its splendid entirety. If at all.

Here is an explanation of why it is so funny.
1. Mark Carmody is the local ABC news weather reporter. Virginia is the newsreader.
2. Mark wears a different flower each day, usually large and ostentatious.
3. Mark is genuinly entertaining, and as a result receives a lot of flak from the general public, because ABC presenters are meant to be bland and boring.
4. The flower Mark is wearing today is a cactus.
5. The "Garnaut report" is a report on global warming completed by Ross Garnaut for the Rudd Australian government.
6. Mark has an unusual way of pronouncing many of his words.
7. Most of the comment in the letters column of the Canberra Time during the run-up to the elections focused on whether the writer approved or disapproved of Mark the weatherman. Which was so far removed from any of the election issues, it was just as if the voter was sick of hearing about the elections!

I certainly was, and I was out of town for three of those weeks!

In the cartoon one also sees the four horsemen of the apocalypse, referred to recently by Scott in Ewen's popular blog, which made me recall this cartoon. The cartoon appeared in the Canberra Times a month ago.

As a footnote, is there nothing more boring than hearing incessantly news about other countries' elections?

Wednesday, 29 October 2008

Puns are for children, not groan readers

Posted by speedygeoff on Wednesday, October 29, 2008 with
“A gentleman will walk but never run” – Sting, from the song "An Englishman in New York"!


Photo by flashduck!

I have been hearing conversations of late concerning the timing of our Monthly Handicap runs. Specifically, there is some discussion about whether the shorter races should start a little later than they do: whether we should send off the longer race first and, 15 or 20 minutes later, start the shorter races. It was done like this in the past and seemed to work OK. We could still work off just one big clock, and add the minutes difference to all the start times of the groups of the shorter races.

Some of the advantages of changing it would be that short course runners and walkers would not have to wait so long until the presentations. As it stands, some are leaving before the presentations, thus missing out on announcements, T-Shirt awards, and event awards. And we are getting more families using child-care, who may not want to stay around as long either. And it's good to get the long event away early, it could even start earlier and enjoy cooler conditions. And the short course runners are coming in as the fastest long course groups are starting out - the short courses are all out and back I think - which makes for danger, it is difficult for an exhausted short course runner sprinting to the finish to negotiate a pack of very fast long course runners putting in their sprint from the start, and vice versa.

There are also advantages keeping it as it is. As it stands the short course runners are nearly all in before the first of the walkers arrive; then the walkers are usually all in well before the first of the long course runners arrive. Having these races finishing together will make sorting out who is in which event and timing and recording a good deal more difficult; and a lot more chaotic with 200 people milling around together at the finish area at the same time waiting to record their names. Also there will be more of a rush for the tea and coffee. And some of us short course runners have enjoyed heading off for a cool-down run while watching and encouraging the long course runners.

Another thing I am aware of with our handicaps and the large numbers they attract is the need to take care as we race on narrow and sometimes eroded tracks. As we pass people in both directions it is really up to runners who are coming through fastest to watch out for runners ahead; it is not up to front markers to anticipate when and how back-markers will come through. While I haven't been too good at this in the past, and on Sunday found myself unfortunately "barging through" a group near the turn with walkers and runners coming the other way as well, for which I apologise, I do intend being more watchful and careful in future. And anyway it is good fun racing along with so many on the track, I really enjoy it. I don't want to spoil the enjoyment for anyone else.

And as they say, "people who wear glass slippers shouldn't kick stones".

Gary racing away at the start of Sunday's handicap


Photo by John Kennedy

One of the many groups of runners heading off from the start.


There are at least two speedygeese amongst that lot. Photo by John Kennedy

Today was a bit serious. Tomorrow should be punnier than it was today.

Tuesday, 28 October 2008

The World Is Your Lobster

Posted by speedygeoff on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 with
song of the week
ABC television's "Rage" showed three brilliant videos on the weekend; the live version of "Lost" by Coldplay which is my favourite track on the Viva La Vida album and is presumably their third single release; "Take Back The City" by Snow Patrol from an album which has finally been released and which I must acquire asap; and Death Cab For Cutie's "Cath" which is a great track on their latest album and getting JJJ airplay I believe.

I have featured these three songs on my blog in the past, so to resurrect my "song of the week" I have the video for another great DCfC song which has grown on me and is now my equal favourite along with their "Grapevine Fires" from "Narrow Stairs".

song of the week: "Your Heart Is An Empty Room" by Death Cab for Cutie from "Plans".



An Ominous Age
Birthdays about now include Colin last week who turned 47; Kelley this week who will be 48; Grandchild number 3 of 10 Jarod who is 8 today; and this blog’s youngest reader whose 15th birthday was yesterday! That’s not – very –young -any –more –is -it!

Please comment if you are a regular reader and are younger than 15! I am not expecting any comments, surprise me!

8 and 15 are very comfortable ages - although not totally comfortable; the 8 year old has an older sister to keep up with, while the 15 year old should be past the worst of being a teenager, but may not be there quite yet.

But late forties is ominously uncomfortable. The best way of dealing with the approaching-fifty syndrome is to expect the best. 50 won't be too bad, really! I found 60 a hoot!

For all of you, for all sorts of different reasons, the best is yet to come. The world is your lobster.

Monday training was also a taste of what's to come. We ran on a circuit of ~410 metres, pushing the pace for a gentle downhill 200m on a somewhat sandy soft surface, jogging the rest, ten intervals in thirty minutes. For the next few weeks we are going to run the circuit continuously, seeing how many circuits we can run in 45 minutes, still only sprinting 200m of it each time around.

Present were Rae, Mick C, Christopher, Margaret, Carolyne, Amanda, Rachelle, Ruth, Katie, Ken, Neil, Bronwyn, Jodie, me, Helen, Yelena, Joel, Alan & Cathy.

This Thursday's track program
6.00 pm 100m
7.00 pm 4 x 800m Relay
7.15 pm 200m
7.30 pm 400m
7.45 pm 3000m/5000m

The Spring Series events
There are different versions of the Spring Series events around. I have to believe that the calendar on the cross country club website is the correct version. In particular, what is in the November Vetrunner calendar is incorrect!

Edit: the yellow "calendar of events" card put out by the Cross Country Club turns out to be correct, and the calendar found in the ACTCCC website is incorrect. And what I published on 10 October in this blog turns out to be correct!

So, here again is the actual program; and note that all races start at 6:15pm this year:
Tue 4 Nov Weston Park 2/5 km
Tue 11 Nov Black Mountain Peninsula 2/5 km, John Cardiff Close
Tue 18 Nov O'Connor Ridge 2/5 km, Masterman Street, east of the Bruce stadium
Tue 25 Nov Boathouse 2/5 km, Menindee Drive, Parkes
Tue 2 Dec Stromlo Forest Park 2/5 km Uriarra Road

Finishing Bulls Head 27.2k downhill


Hmmm. For those who haven't seen me for a while. A new white beard. Scary.

Monday, 27 October 2008

Skating On Hot Water

Posted by speedygeoff on Monday, October 27, 2008 with
My training progress
last week’s target: 90k
achieved: 42k (couldn't run most days!)
year 2008 total to date: 3320k in 43 weeks
this week's target: whatever! (sigh)
weight: 65kg ►◄ (oops!)

How the speedygeese have gone in recent races:

ACTMA monthly handicap: O’Connor Ridge 8k
3 Carolyne Kramar W40 53:37 54.4%
4 Ewen Thompson M50 45:20 61.9
14 Alan Duus M60 43:02 71.6
28 Christopher Lang M55 44:06 67.4
32 Caroline Campbell W65 48:53 79.8
37 Rod Lynch M45 34:37 79.3
45 Colin Farlow M45 35:58 75.9
46 David Baussmann M55 43:42 68.7
51 Kathy Sims W55 44:40 76.6
58 Margaret McSpadden W60 54:54 65.4
65 Geoff Barker M60 46:44 66.4
82 Ruth Baussmann W55 52:52 65.4
89 Cathy Newman W45 45:19 67.0
92 Jeni Greenland W30 47:11 58.9
95 Roger Pilkington M45 46:11 59.8
98 Mick Horan M45 44:09 62.5
100 finishers

O’Connor Ridge 4k
10 Katie Forestier W40 17:10 81.1%
11 Ken White M55 17:11 80.7
17 Neil Boden M55 19:42 72.3
26 Amanda Walker W40 19:38 70.1
34 Gary Bowen M50 18:35 72.5
36 Geoff Moore M60 17:57 80.7
37 Cathy Montalto W55 22:11 73.4
43 Jodie Sims W30 20:25 62.1
61 finishers

Bulls Head
Mick Horan thinks his downhill time was ~2:08. Looks as if Steve is right: we will all have to do some downhill training before next year's run, so we can get under 2 hours and challenge CJ's time!

From Sonia Veldhoven
Hey Geoff
One of my new running buddies from work is the president of an athletics club here in Melbourne and he is trying to recruit new members. That is how I ended up at the Box Hill track surrounded by teenagers! BUT I bravely entered the 5000 having not run a proper track race since little athletics and I ran 20.45. I was quite surprised to run under 21mins but very pleased. The coach (Wal Robinson) handed me my splits at the end of the race on a piece of paper! The thing I have noticed about Melbourne runners is that they are not very techy with their running, no one has a Garmin and even my simple Timex with the lap splits is a bit of a novelty! They were all very welcoming though (despite the lack of gadgetry!) and I had so much fun I think I might just join!
Hope you are well, high fives for the team, I miss you all!
Sonia


Jodie won at Parkway...


So this month the handicapper hit her..

Edit: I have removed what I wrote here earlier. It was stupid. Why do I keep skating on hot water?

Sunday, 26 October 2008

Live And Let Die

Posted by speedygeoff on Sunday, October 26, 2008 with
That's it, I have had enough of Beatles' titles. There were some good ones left: Among many others All My Loving/ Cry Baby Cry/ Doctor Robert/ Eleanor Rigby/ Glass Onion/ Honey Don't/ I Want You (She's So Heavy)/ Martha My Dear/ Maxwell's Silver Hammer/ Misery/ Penny Lane/ Please Mr. Postman/ Polythene Pam/ Savoy Truffle/ Sexy Sadie/ Till There Was You/ While My Guitar Gently Weeps/ Within You Without You/ You're Going to Lose That Girl/ You've Got to Hide Your Love Away. Someone else can have them.

Speedygeese results from Saturday's AACT track races:
800m Joel Pearson 2:11.14
800m Thea Zimpel 2:52.14 pb, breaking the pb she set Thursday night!
3000m Yelena Pearson 15 something, not quite a pb
5000m Geoff Moore 20:36.35
5000m Thea Zimpel 22:36.57

Yesterday's 5k was my first since March and was a hard slog and I had had enough after five laps (2k in 8:00 exactly), but I was happy to run 20 something knowing the time would be slow; recovery from Bulls Head will take a while yet. Both 5k splits of the Canberra Times 10k Fun Run a few weeks ago were faster! But we cannot count either of them, so 20:36 establishes an M60 pb which should be easy to target and beat next time.

When will I recover? Being not sure, I will try and keep the training and racing going and it will be whenever. I am not counting my chickens until I see the whites of their eyes.

Every run is an achievement, I reckon.

Saturday, 25 October 2008

Band On The Run

Posted by speedygeoff on Saturday, October 25, 2008 with
The rest of the speedygeese results from Thursday:
3000m Thea Zimpel 12:48.03
800m Thea Zimpel 2:53.03
Spiral 7:
Jill Pearson W50 15:04
Caroline Campbell W65 14:25
Rod Lynch M45 10:40
Miranda Rawlinson W55 14:47
Bronwyn Calver W35 12:56
Cathy Montalto W55 14:25
Margaret McSpadden W60 15:48
Geoff Barker M60 15:04
Gary Bowen M50 13:12
Roger Pilkington M45 13:39

I banned uphill running for myself many years ago when my achilles were bad; I'm stronger now. The achilles are much better so I can train and race up hills again. I banned downhill running too because my balance was bad. That is just starting to improve now with exercises, but the consequences are that I have no quad strengtth so last Sunday's run left me sore. This week I have researched training for downhill racing, and I think I have hit the nail on the jackpot, here is the very best information I could find, a long article by Owen Anderson. Skim it if you will, but it makes very good close reading.

Owen Anderson on Downhill Running
What athletes should do when their quadriceps muscles start going downhill?
Twenty-four hours after your first major football (or cricket, rugby, basketball, etc.) competition of the season, your leg muscles are so sore that even easy jogging produces considerable discomfort, and it is impossible to carry out the training you have planned for the day. The biggest moaners in your legs are your quadriceps femoris muscles (the 'quads') in your thighs; they cry out in pain each time one of your feet hits the ground as you jog along slowly. What can be done to prevent such muscle carnage, particularly with regard to those complaining quads?

The answer, of course, is to let your quads go downhill. No - we don't mean you should allow your quads to become weaker; we want you to expose your quads to some downhill running. A judicious amount of well-timed downhill running can actually help prevent leg-muscle soreness, especially in your quadriceps muscles.

If this seems a little bizarre, remember that muscle soreness often results when one's muscles are challenged by a greater-than-normal number of 'eccentric actions', in which the muscles attempt to shorten while they are actually being elongated. The quads are notorious soreheads, mainly because gravity pulls the knee downward (eg, produces knee flexion) with every footstrike during the act of running. This gravity- and impact-induced flexing at the knee stretches out the quads at the exact time they are attempting to shorten to prevent excessive knee flexion. The resulting, repetitive, high-tension strain (which occurs about 90 times per minute per leg as you run) can produce significant quadriceps-muscle damage.

Normal training for your sport, of course, protects your quads to some extent; the quads simply get used to a certain level of eccentric action. However, if you run more than you usually do because you are involved in a major match or serious preparatory workout, your quads won't be fully prepared to handle the extra stress. If you run faster than you usually do, your quads will also be prone to trouble; increased limb acceleration heightens impact forces in the leg and forces the quads to work harder (and more quickly) to control knee flexion.

'Downhill running gives this adaptation a special boost, so that it will be hard to damage your quads, even when you go beyond your usual training limits'
Even when you are not running faster than usual, downhill running magnifies the eccentric, 'pulling-apart' stress on the quads, because the leg 'falls' a little farther than normal with each stride. Thus the acceleration of the leg is greater at impact (footstrike), and the forces which produce knee flexion are consequently higher. The quads, of course, still attempt to carry out their yeoman-like work of resisting knee flexion, but the stress on them is much higher. Microscopic tears in the quads' muscle fibres and connective tissues can occur, and considerable soreness can result.

That makes downhill running sound a bad idea, but in fact the small-scale controlled damage associated with well-regulated downhill efforts actually forces your quads to adapt and strengthen themselves so that they will be more immune to damage during subsequent challenges. Think back to the first serious workouts you ever carried out in your sport, for example. Your muscles were undoubtedly sore the following day, and perhaps they were painful for several weeks whenever you undertook particularly challenging training sessions. Gradually, however, you developed the capacity to work at high levels without incurring much soreness; your muscles had adapted to the strain produced during your training. Downhill running gives this adaptation process a special boost, so that it will be hard to damage your quads - even when you go beyond your usual training limits.

If you carry out your downhill runs properly, your quads will be only slightly sore after the first negative-incline session, and after a few bouts of downhill effort it will be hard to get your quads to react negatively to even the most heated football contest, the most-prolonged, multi-set tennis match, or a much-longer-than-usual run. Supplying protection for your quads is easy and straightforward, and the protection applies to everything that you do - not just to future downhill running.

The six-week factor
Amazingly enough, just one downhill workout can furnish decent protection for the quads, and the 'soreness insurance' provided by a single bout of downhill running can in some cases last for six weeks or more. Several years ago, scientists at the University of Massachusetts asked 109 individuals to perform two sets of 35 maximal, eccentric contractions of the biceps muscle in the upper part of one arm. Basically, these eccentric contractions consisted of lowering a very heavy weight, which forced the biceps muscles to elongate as the weight was lowered; simultaneously, biceps-muscle fibres were attempting to shorten to stabilise the weight's movement.

After this unusual workout, biceps soreness and tightness peaked about two to three days later, and maximal swelling occurred a few days after that. Biceps strength declined immediately after the rigorous session and stayed below-par for 10 days.

The biceps muscles were clearly damaged by the eccentric workout (we won't hurt your legs to this extent with our recommended downhill sessions below, because we don't want you to lose 10 good days of training), but they adapted very nicely. When the individuals tried the same biceps routine six weeks later, there was appreciably less soreness and little loss of muscle strength, even though there had been no intervening biceps training. The biceps muscles were somehow protected from problems as a result of that initial eccentric session.

Why pain after 10 weeks?
Interestingly enough, the protection didn't last much longer than six weeks. When a second group of subjects waited 10 weeks after their initial eccentric workout to stress their biceps again, their biceps were thrown into uncontrollable agony and lost most of their strength. What was going on? Why could the biceps 'remember' what happened six weeks before - but not 10 weeks before?

The Massachusetts researchers speculated that a strenuous bout of eccentric exercise 'teaches' the nervous system how to better control and distribute the forces that are acting on particular muscles. In theory, this lessens the strain on individual muscle fibres when eccentric activity tries to tear them apart and thereby reduces muscle damage and consequent pain. Just as the nervous system can learn to do this, it can also forget, and this forgetting seems to take place after slightly more than six weeks (bear in mind that the rate of forgetting may depend on the severity of the initial workout; a 'timid' eccentric workout might be forgotten after four weeks, while a strongly fibre-damaging one could be retained by the nervous system for a couple of months).

Australian rats reveal sarcomere secrets
The Massachusetts neural theory is a nice one, but does it really work that way? To check it out, scientists at Monash University in Australia tested 16 laboratory rats on treadmills over a five-day period. Eight of these rats participated only in 'uphill' (inclined) running, while the other eight ran only 'downhill' (declined running). Actual workouts consisted of five-minute work intervals with 1.5-minute recoveries, starting with three work intervals on the first day of training and building up to seven intervals on the fifth day. Running speed during the work intervals was a rather modest 16 metres per minute (yes, that's a 100-minute mile, but remember that rats have short legs). After five days, the rats' quadriceps muscles were tested for strength and then biopsied.

A key finding was that the quadriceps muscle cells of the decline-trained rats contained almost 10% more sarcomeres per cell, compared to the quads of the inclined rodents. To understand what sarcomeres are, bear in mind that a muscle cell is a barrel-shaped structure, and each 'barrel' is filled with several hundred to several thousand cylindrical, threadlike structures called myofibrils. To picture this, simply imagine a pipe-shaped structure (the muscle cell) stuffed with countless numbers of small cylindrical wires (the myofibrils). Incidentally, when we say that a muscle cell is shaped like a pipe, we are referring to a section of cylindrical water pipe, not to a pipe used for smoking purposes.

The myofibrils themselves are composed of microscopic, cylindrical compartments laid end to end (picture tiny cylinders or cotton reels glued together at their ends to make one long cylinder). These compartments are called the sarcomeres, and within the sarcomeres are the proteins (filaments) which actually allow muscles to both shorten and elongate. As special filaments slide inward (toward the middles of the sarcomeres), the myofibrils and overall muscle cell shorten, but when the filaments slide outward, the muscle gets longer.

As mentioned, downhill running induced the muscle cells to add more sarcomeres to their myofibrils. Why is this increase in number of sarcomeres beneficial, and how can it prevent muscle damage and soreness? Since muscle-cell length itself didn't change significantly as a result of the downhill running, the fact that there were more sarcomeres per muscle cell meant that during eccentric contractions, when the whole muscle cell was elongating, each sarcomere in a downhill-trained muscle would have to elongate less, and thus each sarcomere would be less likely to sustain internal damage.
More sarcomeres mean less strain
To illustrate this point, let's say that there are two muscle cells which are each one-inch long but must stretch out to two inches during an eccentric action. If one of these muscle cells has 10 sarcomeres, but the other (the downhill-trained fibre) has 20, you can easily see that the 10 sarcomeres would each have to stretch out by one-tenth of an inch to get the cell up to two inches, but the 20 sarcomeres in the other cell would only have to stretch by one-twentieth of an inch each to make the cell long enough. There is less strain on the sarcomeres during an eccentric contraction when there are more sarcomeres per myofibril. It's a pretty neat adaptation!

Thus, when you run downhill, you're giving your muscle cells a wake-up call to start tacking on more sarcomeres. The increased sarcomere density then reduces stress on the myofibrils and protects you against soreness and damage accruing from future downhill running and very tough or prolonged workouts and races (if the Massachusetts neural theory is also correct, your nervous system also helps out by distributing strain more effectively and evenly throughout your muscles). Since damage is lessened, it also means that you can recover more quickly from very severe training sessions and competitions - and be ready for subsequent quality work more quickly than the poor oik with fewer sarcomeres.

The up-and-down Kenyans
It's no accident that élite Kenyan runners train unceasingly on uphills and downhills and can carry out more quality training than any other runners in the world without being debilitated by muscular soreness and stiffness (five-time world cross-country champion Paul Tergat is rumoured to carry out five to six red-hot sessions per week when he is training seriously, and Kenyan runners participating in the pre-World-Championship Kenyan national cross-country camp routinely conduct six sizzling sessions per week and 19 weekly workouts overall). Schooled on the severe inclines in the western part of the Rift Valley (or on the Aberdares' harsh slopes if the runner happens to come from central Kenya), the Kenyans' muscles probably possess a surfeit of sarcomeres and thus are more resistant to the wear-and-tear damage associated with both very fast and very high-volume running.
One shouldn't forget, too, that the presence of more sarcomeres means that muscle contractions can take place more quickly, since each sarcomere has to shorten less to make the overall muscle cell compress (the sliding of the filaments over one another inside sarcomeres takes time; the further they have to slide, the longer it takes to condense a muscle). Using our example of one-inch muscle cells again, but this time saying that they must contract to a length of one-half inch, one can readily see that the 10-sarcomere cell must shorten by .05 inches per sarcomere, while the 20-sarcomere fibre needs to abbreviate by just .025 inches per sarcomere. The combination of quick-contracting, injury-resistant muscles is a trademark of the Kenyan runners.

Here's what to do
So how should you actually carry out your protective, downhill workouts? Once a week for about four weeks, go to a hill which slopes downward for 50 metres or more; for your initial workout, choose a hill with a very modest declination of about 3 to 4% or so; you can increase the severity of the grade later, after you have become a seasoned downhill runner. After a good warm-up, begin carrying out 'reps' which consist of nothing more than running down your chosen slope. At first, don't attempt to run rapidly; simply use a customary training pace. Each time you get to the bottom of the hill, turn around, jog back to the top (the ascents are not noted for their soreness-reducing properties, but they are nicely strengthening for all the muscles in your legs), and continue. For your first downhill effort, maintain this pattern for 10 minutes, giving you slightly less than five total minutes of downhill running (ascents usually take longer than descents).

'You may also choose to upgrade the speed of your downhill running, within reason, and you may want to begin utilising a steeper hill'

Your quads' behaviour during the 48 hours after this initial session will provide you with much information about their eccentric strength and soreness-resistance. If they flare up with considerable pain and stiffness during this follow-up period, you can derive some measure of comfort from ibuprofen or some similar non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication - and from knowing that your quads really needed this training and will truly be stronger in the future (once healing has occurred). Your next workout - carried out after about a week - should be exactly the same as the first, and you will notice considerably less quad complaining after this one. Like the athletes who experienced no troubles after the initial, 10-minute downhill trial, you will then begin to gradually increase the amount of time you spend on the hill. Expanding the total hill running in three- to five-minute increments per session works well for many athletes. For example, you might choose to progress from 10 total minutes of running (including downhill and uphill) to 14 minutes for the next workout. If there are no serious problems, you could move to 18 minutes for the subsequent session, and so on. You may also choose to upgrade the speed of your downhill running, within reason, and you may want to begin utilising a steeper hill (avoid severely steep slopes which dramatically change your running biomechanics, however). You may continue this overall progression for longer than four weeks, if you like, but a four-week programme (with one hill workout each week) should fortify your quads against unusual pain for at least six weeks after the fourth workout - and probably longer.

Things to watch for
A few 'form pointers' may help you with your hill workouts. As you run down your chosen slope, lean forward naturally and comfortably; avoid the temptation to lean back with your upper body. Don't let yourself get out of control, but don't stiffen up or resist the hill too much; learn to stay coordinated and balanced as gravity does much of the work for you.

Recent research indicates that you can manipulate your stride lengths slightly to reduce the soreness associated with your initial stab at downhill training but that you will eventually have to 'pay' your soreness bill unless you continue to understride on hills. In an investigation carried out at the School of Sport, Health, and Exercise Sciences at the University of Wales in Bangor, 18 male runners (average age 21 years) ran downhill using their preferred stride lengths, extra-long stride lengths (overstrides), or abbreviated strides (understrides). Two weeks later, the runners ran downhill again, this time using their preferred stride lengths. Muscle strength and soreness were assessed after each bout of running ('Effect of Stride Length Manipulation on Symptoms of Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage and the Repeated Bout Effect,' Journal of Sports Science, Vol. 19(5), pp. 333-340, 2001).

After the first downhill exertion, the overstride group suffered from the most soreness, while the understride group retained the most strength. This makes sense: during overstriding on downslopes, a foot falls farther with each step and is thus travelling at a higher speed when it hits the running surface (remember that gravity accelerates motion). As a result, impact forces are greater, and the quads must undergo augmented strain to control flexion at the knee. In contrast, understriding reduces foot speed at impact and lowers the strain on the quads. In effect, the understriders had less damage after the first workout, compared with the normal striders and overstriders, but would they also have as much protection from soreness and muscle-strength loss during subsequent efforts?

No! After the second bout of downhill running, which occurred two weeks after the first, the initial understriders retained strength just as well as the normal striders and overstriders, indicating that the initial, pain-reducing understriding did not interfere with the quads' ability to maintain usual strength levels after eccentric exercise. However, the initial understriders were least protected from soreness associated with the second bout of running; they had to pay their pain bill as soon as they began to run normally! For this reason, we recommend simply using your normal strides as you run downhill; don't try to consciously minimise stride length as part of an effort to control soreness. Control post-exercise pain by utilising reasonable, non-excessive workouts, not with running-form adjustments.

Protecting the hamstrings and...
This training protocol will do a great job of shielding your quads from soreness and injury, but what about the muscles running along the backs of your legs, especially your hamstrings and calf muscles? Jogging or walking backwards down hills has sometimes been recommended as a way of fortifying those muscles. Although such a strategy makes a certain amount of sense, the gains in pain resistance will probably not be as great as those attained for the quads, unless you plan to carry out future workouts and competitions while running backwards. Remember that there is probably a neural component to pain protection; your nervous system learns and remembers patterns of muscular control which control damage and pain. While your nervous system is a great thing, it may not be able to apply the lessons it incorporates from backwards movement to straight-ahead running, since the two patterns of locomotion are so different.

Perhaps the best way to protect your hamstrings from pain is to carry out high-bench step-ups with regularity. To do these, begin from a standing position on top of a knee-high bench or step, with your full body weight supported by your left foot. Your right foot should be free and held slightly behind your body. Lower your body in a controlled manner (in effect doing a one-leg 'squat' with your left leg) until the toes of your right foot touch the ground, while continuing to support all of your weight on your left foot. Return to the starting position by applying force to the bench or step with your left foot and by straightening your left leg. Repeat for a total of 10 reps, and then switch over to the right leg. It is critical that you maintain absolutely upright posture with your trunk throughout this entire movement; avoid the tendency to lean forward for balance as your 'trailing' leg drops toward the floor.

This exercise places incredible eccentric stress on the hamstrings, so it should be approached cautiously, especially if you have had hamstring troubles in the past. Begin with just 10 reps per leg, and gradually increase to three sets of 20 reps. As your strength and skill improve, you may also hold dumbbells while you carry out the exercise. Another advanced form of this exercise works as follows: As your trailing, non-weight-bearing leg ascends after touching the floor, accelerate its movement, flex the knee, and bring the thigh of this leg out in front of your body, so that the thigh is actually parallel with the bench surface. As you do so, swing the opposite arm forward, too. In effect, you are mimicking an aggressive running stride. Hold the thigh parallel with the bench for a moment, continuing to support full body weight on one leg, and then gradually drop the leg behind you again as you squat with the support leg. This is a great exercise for building hamstring strength and overall balance!

...the calf muscles
To improve eccentric strength of your calf muscles, simply carry out single-leg heel raises on an inclined surface. To do these, stand with relaxed, erect posture on a slightly inclined surface (a pavement on a moderate hill will work, in case you don't have a special inclined board), with all your body weight supported on your right foot and your right knee barely flexed (your left leg should be flexed at the knee so that your left foot is off the ground and your left shin is roughly parallel with the floor). Contract your right calf muscles as strongly as possible, so that your right heel rises vertically off the ground and you rock forward on your foot, supporting full body weight on your toes and extreme forefoot. That's the beginning position for your one-footed heel raises.
Now, let your right heel move back toward the ground smoothly, evenly, and swiftly. Don't collapse your ankle, don't let your foot wobble from side to side, and don't let your upper body jerk around - just drop your heel toward the ground quickly and efficiently. As you do this, body-weight support will shift from your toes and forefoot to the mid-foot region.

As your right heel initiates contact with the ground, let your right ankle dorsiflex naturally, and let your right knee increase its flexion (obviously, your ankle and knee will be flexing simultaneously). As you do all this, your right hip will be in a slightly flexed position. Let the ankle and knee flex slightly more than they would during the stance phase of your gait cycle when you are running. All of this should be done with control and quickness.
Once you have achieved ankle and knee flexion, don't dally - immediately rock back up onto your toes, plantar-flexing your right ankle at the same time as you are straightening out your right knee. Hold this position for two seconds - and you have completed one rep!

In your first stab at this exercise, continue on for about 10 to 15 more reps on your right foot, and then give your other calf a chance to join in the fun, completing an identical number of reps on your left side. As you perform the exercise, move rhythmically and without any hesitation in the overall movement (except for the two-second 'holds' on tiptoe), and try to maintain good balance, posture, and stability at all times (initially, you may grab a wall, fence, or other structure for support if you are having trouble with your balance). Attempt to maintain a running-specific posture at all times, and try to sustain a 'feeling of rhythmic, relaxed running' as you rock back and forth on your foot; don't scrunch up your upper body, and don't look down at your legs as you carry out the movements.

So what's the bottom line? When you carry out your pain-preventing downhill training, it's nice to remember that your uphill climbs are enhancing your economy, and your downhill runs are having a profound impact on your leg-muscles' eccentric strength and ability to stand up to hard training. By running downhill, you are adding sarcomeres to your leg-muscle cells, and those additional sarcomeres should quicken your strides and help keep you free from injury and soreness in the future. In addition, carrying out high-bench step-ups and one-leg heel raises on an inclined surface will protect the 'back' sides of your legs. The freedom from injury which you attain will allow you to train and compete more consistently and thus become a much better athlete.

Owen Anderson

Friday, 24 October 2008

Last Night

Posted by speedygeoff on Friday, October 24, 2008 with
"Feeling no pain/feeling good in my brain” - from "Last Night".

"Last Night" is a track written by Beatle George Harrison for "The Traveling Wilburys", of which he was a member. Well, we nearly had Traveling Wilburys at the track last night, it was "The Triathloning Bilbys" who competed with us in every event except Pole Vault. It was great to have some different competition, and they thoroughly enjoyed the experience, as we did too.

At the track last night it was almost cold enough to throw another blanket on the fire. Which made for some fast times in the longer events. Bronwyn ran a spiral 7 pb by 20 seconds; Thea ran an 800m pb by 0.1 seconds but I don't have her exact time. Kevin is back to form in the 800m which bodes well for next week's M60 4 x 800m relay record attempt. Ken had another great run as he establishes his M55 pbs and dominates the age group.

speedygeese on track last night
800m
M55 Ken White 2:24.07 84.2%
M45 Rod Lynch 2:28.63 76.9
M60 Kevin Chamberlain 2:31.10 84.8
M50 Gary Bowen 2:34.99 75.7
W40 Katie Forestier 2:47.10 71.0
W40 Amanda Walker 2:59.64 64.9
M60 Geoff Sims 2:59.79 70.2
W55 Kathy Sims 3:00.06 77.5
W35 Bronwyn Calver 3:03.98 62.7

3000m
M45 Rod Lynch 11:18.82 72.9%
M60 Geoff Moore 11:50.40 77.0
W40 Katie Forestier 11:57.07 74.5
M55 Ken White 12:16.64 71.2
M50 Gary Bowen 12:24.12 68.2
M45 Roger Pilkington 12:27.96 66.7
M60 Kevin Chamberlain 12:31.24 74.1
M50 Ewen Thompson 12:32.80 67.4
W40 Amanda Walker 13:17.34 65.8
W35 Bronwyn Calver 13:26.05 64.6
M60 Geoff Barker 15:49.57 59.7

This will be updated with Thea's times, she ran ~2:52 in the 800m, she also ran the 3000m.
And I am yet to see any spiral 7 times.

This one's for the Bilbys



The Bilby who thinks he is a goose


Roger has a foot in both camps. As does Thea.

Thursday, 23 October 2008

• I Call Your Name

Posted by speedygeoff on Thursday, October 23, 2008 with
If you have kept your ear to the grapevine, you will know that the Bilbys Triathlon group (note spelling!) are our guests at Masters track tonight. So even if you are not competing, you could come on out and practise hospitality!

A reminder of tonight's program:
6.00 spiral 7
6.30 1200/2000m walk
6.50 200m
7.00 800m
7.30 4x100m relay
7.45 3000m

Amanda does track


Amanda at Parkway

Template Change
Today I have installed a new non-standard template. I hope you like it. It's pretty easy to do, if you first save the text of widgets you want to keep and note their order, so they can be re-installed. It worked OK so I might yet replace the new template with a fancier one.

Yeah Right!

Wednesday, 22 October 2008

• Something

Posted by speedygeoff on Wednesday, October 22, 2008 with




Rock the Boat!

I don't mind rocking the boat, and I don't mind rattling some feathers. I am not one of these timid people, incapacitated by the thought that if they rock the boat, they may get thrown off the gravy train. Boldness and daring are good, and even if I am sometimes skating on hot water, or out on a limb without a paddle, more often than not I can see the carrot at the end of the tunnel, so all is well.